Three experiments were conducted to determine the extent to which perceived
separation of speech and interference improves speech recognition in the f
ree field. Target speech stimuli were 320 grammatically correct but nonmean
ingful sentences spoken by a female talker. In the first experiment the int
erference was a recording of either one or two female talkers reciting a co
ntinuous stream of similar nonmeaningful sentences. The target talker was a
lways presented from a loudspeaker directly in front (0 degrees). The inter
ference was either presented from the front loudspeaker (the F-F condition)
or from both a right loudspeaker (60 degrees) and the front loudspeaker, w
ith the right leading the front by 4 ms (the F-RF condition). Due to the pr
ecedence effect, the interference in the F-RF condition was perceived to be
well to the right, while the target talker was heard from the front. For b
oth the single-talker and two-talker interference, there was a sizable impr
ovement in speech recognition in the: F-RF condition compared with the F-F
condition. However, a second experiment showed that there was no F-RF advan
tage when the interference was noise modulated by the single- or multi-chan
nel envelope of the two-talker masker. Results of the third experiment indi
cated that the advantage of perceived separation is not limited to conditio
ns where the interfering speech is understandable. (C) 2001 Acoustical Soci
ety of America.