J. Frielingsdorf et al., Evaluation of septal hypertrophy and systolic function iu diseases that cause left ventricular hypertrophy: A 3-dimensional echocardiography study, J AM S ECHO, 14(5), 2001, pp. 370-377
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
Objectives: The goals of this study were to determine regional systolic fun
ction of the septum and to relate it to regional wall thickness and wall st
ress.
Background: Wall thickening, a parameter of systolic function: is determine
d by wall thickness and wall stress. In patients with hypertrophic obstruct
ive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), hypertrophic nonobstructive cardiomyopathy (HNCM
), and hypertensive heart disease (HHD), regional systolic function of norm
al and hypertrophic septal regions has been incompletely characterized by 3
-dimensional echocardiography. Thus, multiplane transesophageal echocardiog
raphy with 5-dimensional reconstruction of the septum was used.
Methods and Results: In 49 patients (15 controls, II with HOCM, a with HNCM
, and 15 with HHD) 4 parallel (2 basal and 2 apical) equidistant short-axis
cross sections from base to apes were obtained from the reconstructed sept
um. Ln each short-asis cross section. 6 wall-thickness measurements were ma
de in 15 degrees intervals at end diastole and end systole, for a total of
48 measurements in each patient. Fractional thickening was calculated as wa
ll thickening divided by end-diastolic wall thickness. wall thickness of th
e basal cross sections was significantly thicker (P < .001) in HOCM and HNC
M than in HHD. However, circumferential wall thickness was more evenly dist
ributed in HOCM and HHD when compared with HOCM. In tile basal cross sectio
ns, fractional thickening was similarly reduced in all hearts, though basal
wall stress was significantly different in all groups (P < .001). In the a
pical cross sections, R all thickness was similar in all diseased hearts, b
ut fractional thickening was better (P < .001) and wall stress lower (P < .
001) ill HNCM than in HOCM and HHD.
Conclusions: In septal regions without or with only mild hypertrophy, regio
nal systolic function is preserved and appears to he determined bp hemodyna
mic factors such as wall stress. However, in regions with moderate to sever
e hypertrophy, systolic function is markedly and uniformly impaired in all
groups, which seems not to be caused by differences in mall thickness and w
all stress but by the degree of the myocardial disease process.