WHAT WORKS BEST - REFLECTIONS ON THE ROLE OF THEORY IN PLANNING - RESPONSE

Authors
Citation
Dc. Knudsen, WHAT WORKS BEST - REFLECTIONS ON THE ROLE OF THEORY IN PLANNING - RESPONSE, Economic development quarterly, 11(3), 1997, pp. 208-211
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Economics,"Planning & Development
ISSN journal
08912424
Volume
11
Issue
3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
208 - 211
Database
ISI
SICI code
0891-2424(1997)11:3<208:WWB-RO>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
In this commentary, the author considers how theory helps one understa nd the development process and how it helps situate the role of planni ng as an agent of change in society. The problem is not that there is no theory of economic development but that there is too much and that there is little unity to this theory. Theory is also by construction a bout ''what is,'' whereas planning is about ''what should be.'' Planni ng is socially constituted and is, therefore, contingent on ideology, history, and politics. Similarly, planning initiatives reverberate thr ough a region's historic, geographic, economic, social, and political fabric. It is the artificial separation of theory and planning that is at the heart of both ''the problem with planning'' and the ''problem with theory. ''