Purpose: We explore the possibility of gaining suitable vesical capacity an
d continence in bilateral single ureters without having to resort to urinar
y diversion or bladder neck reconstruction.
Materials and Methods: In the last 10 years we treated 6 girls with bilater
al ectopic ureters, and 2 with a single kidney and urethral ectopic ureter.
Both ureters were ectopic in the urethra in 3 cases, and 1 ureter was inse
rted in the urethra and 1 in the bladder neck in the other 3. Preoperative
examinations included ultrasonography, cystography, excretory urography and
endoscopy in all cases, and magnetic resonance imaging in 2. Patient age a
t intervention ranged from 1 month to 8 years.
Results: Cross-trigonal reimplantation of the ectopic ureters through a cor
rectly positioned neomeatus was performed in 7 cases. In 2 patients it was
impossible to reach the ureteral insertion from inside the bladder (1 urete
r in 1 and both ureters in 1), and so the distal tract of these ureters was
resected extravesically as close as possible to the urethra. One patient w
ith a single kidney also had an anorectal malformation and a rectovaginal f
istula. She had pelvic renal ectopia and the ureter was inserted beneath th
e urogenital diaphragm causing minimal bladder capacity. Therefore, a sigmo
id neobladder with appendicostomy was constructed according to the Mitrofan
off principle. A Young-Dees bladder neck plasty was done in 2 patients at t
he same time as ureteral reimplantation and 3 years later in 1. Followup ur
odynamics revealed more than acceptable continence. Bladder capacity was in
sufficient in only 1 polyuric patient.
Conclusions: A bladder with bilateral ureteral ectopia is not necessarily u
seless, and the majority of patients can achieve normal bladder function an
d capacity along with normal transurethral voiding and satisfactory contine
nce.