Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of peripheral blood and oxygen pressure measurements in the assessment of lower extremity arterial disease

Citation
J. De Graaff et al., Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of peripheral blood and oxygen pressure measurements in the assessment of lower extremity arterial disease, J VASC SURG, 33(5), 2001, pp. 1033-1040
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY
ISSN journal
07415214 → ACNP
Volume
33
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1033 - 1040
Database
ISI
SICI code
0741-5214(200105)33:5<1033:IAIROP>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Introduction: Peripheral blood pressure measurements play a prominent role in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with peripheral vascular disease s. Toe pressure of the hallux (TP1) and second toe (TP2) and transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TCPO2) measurements are becoming more important. The ankl e/brachial pressure index (ABPI) is known to be a reliable parameter, but t he toe pressure and TCPO2 are evaluated less thoroughly. Therefore, we eval uated the reproducibility of TP1, TP2, TCPO2, ABPI, ankle pressure (AP), an d brachial pressure (BP). Patients and Methods: In 54 patients with various stages of peripheral vasc ular disease, the intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of BP, AP , ABPI, TPL, TP2, and TCPO2 was investigated by calculating the repeatabili ty coefficient (RC) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and by using Bland-Altman plots. Results: The intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility at 1 day and a fter 1 week of BP, AP, ABPI, and TP1 was substantial and comparable (ICC ra nge, 0.80-0.99), except for the Br after 1 week. The TP2 and TCPO2 were les s reproducible (ICC range, 0.62-0.98). The interobserver RC of BP was 31 mm Hg; of AP, 44 mm Hg; of ABPI, 27%; of TPL, 41 mm Hg; of TP2, 67 mm Hg; and of TCPO2; 30 mm Hg. The difference plot showed that the observer variabili ty was equally distributed across the range of pressure in all measurements . Conclusion: The BP, AP, ABPI, and TP1 have a substantial intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility, whereas TP2 and TCPO2 show worse reproducibi lity Especially when low values (or values around a cutoff value) are measu red, the RC should be taken into account, and repetition of the measurement is advocated.