Lj. Katen et al., Infectious entry by amphotropic as well as ecotropic murine leukemia viruses occurs through an endocytic pathway, J VIROLOGY, 75(11), 2001, pp. 5018-5026
Infectious entry of enveloped viruses is thought to proceed by one of two m
echanisms. pH-dependent viruses enter the cells by receptor-mediated endocy
tosis and are inhibited by transient treatment with agents that prevent aci
dification of vesicles in the endocytic pathway, while pa-independent virus
es are not inhibited by such agents and are thought to enter the cell by di
rect fusion with the plasma membrane. Nearly all retroviruses, including am
photropic murine leukemia virus (MuLV) and human immunodeficiency virus typ
e 1, are classified as pH independent. However, ecotropic MuLV is considere
d to be a pH-dependent virus. We have examined the infectious entry of ecot
ropic and amphotropic MuLVs and found that they were equally inhibited by N
H,CI and bafilomycin A. These agents inhibited both viruses only partially
over the course of the experiments, Agents that block the acidification of
endocytic vesicles also arrest vesicular trafficking. Thus, partial inhibit
ion of the MuLVs could be the result of virus inactivation during arrest in
this pathway. In support of this contention, we found that that the loss o
f infectivity of the MuLVs during treatment of target cells with the drugs
closely corresponded to the loss of activity due to spontaneous inactivatio
n at 37 degreesC in the same period of time. Furthermore, the drugs had no
effect on the efficiency of infection under conditions in which the duratio
n of infection was held to a very short period to minimize the effects of s
pontaneous inactivation. These results indicate that the infectious process
es of both ecotropic and amphotropic MuLVs were arrested rather than aborte
d by transient treatment of the cells with the drugs. We also found that in
fectious viruses were efficiently internalized during treatment. This indic
ated that the arrest occurred in an intracellular compartment and that the
infectious process of both the amphotropic and ecotropic MuLVs very likely
involved endocytosis. An important aspect of this study pertains to the int
erpretation of experiments in which agents that block endocytic acidificati
on inhibit infectivity. As we have found with the MuLVs, inhibition of infe
ctivity may be secondary to the block of endocytic acidification, While thi
s strongly suggests the involvement of an endocytic pathway, it does not ne
cessarily indicate a requirement for an acidic compartment during the infec
tious process. Likewise, a lack of inhibition during transient treatment wi
th the drugs would not preclude an endocytic pathway for viruses that are s
table during the course of the treatment.