Background. Results of a 24-hour urine collection are integral to the selec
tion of the most appropriate intervention to prevent kidney stone recurrenc
e. However, the currently accepted definitions of normal urine values are n
ot firmly supported by the literature. In addition, little information is a
vailable about the relationship between risk of stone formation and the lev
els of urinary factors. Unfortunately, the majority of previous studies of
24-hour urine chemistries were limited by the inclusion of recurrent stone
formers and poorly defined controls.
Methods. We obtained 24-hour urine collections from 807 men and women with
a history of kidney stone disease and 239 without a history who were partic
ipants in three large ongoing cohort studies: the Nurses' Health Study I (N
HS I; mean age of 61 years), the Nurses' Health Study II (NHS II; mean age
of 42 years), and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS; mean age
of 59 years).
Results. Mean 24-hour urine calcium excretion was higher and urine volume w
as lower in cases than controls in NHS I (P less than or equal to 0.01), NH
S II (P less than or equal to 0.13) and HPFS (P less than or equal to 0.01)
, but urine oxalate and citrate did not differ. Among women, urine uric aci
d was similar in cases and controls but was lower in cases in men (P = 0.06
). The frequency of hypercalciuria was higher among the cases in NHS I (P =
0.26), NHS II (P = 0.03), and HPFS (P = 0.02), but 27, 17, and 14% of the
controls, respectively, also met the definition of hypercalciuria. The freq
uency of hyperoxaluria did not differ between cases and controls, but was t
hree times more common among men compared with women. After adjusting for t
he other urinary factors, the relative risk of stone formation increased wi
th increasing urine calcium levels and concentration in all three cohorts b
ut not in a linear fashion. Compared with individuals with a urine calcium
concentration of <75 mg/L, the relative risk of stone formation among those
with a urine calcium concentration of <greater than or equal to>200 mg/L f
or NHS I was 4.34 (95% CI, 1.59 to 11.88), for NHS II was 51.09 (4.27 to 61
1.1), and for HPFS was 4.30 (1.71 to 10.84). There was substantial variatio
n in the relative risks for stone formation for the concentration of other
urine factors within the different cohorts.
Conclusions. The traditional definitions of normal 24-hour urine values nee
d to be! reassessed, as a substantial proportion of controls would be defin
ed as abnormal, and the association with risk of stone formation may be con
tinuous rather than dichotomous. The 24-hour urine chemistries are importan
t for predicting risk of stone formation, but the significance and the magn
itudes of the associations appear to differ by age and gender.