UV radiation evokes negative phototaxis and covering behavior in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis

Authors
Citation
Nl. Adams, UV radiation evokes negative phototaxis and covering behavior in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis, MAR ECOL-PR, 213, 2001, pp. 87-95
Citations number
50
Categorie Soggetti
Aquatic Sciences
Journal title
MARINE ECOLOGY-PROGRESS SERIES
ISSN journal
01718630 → ACNP
Volume
213
Year of publication
2001
Pages
87 - 95
Database
ISI
SICI code
0171-8630(2001)213:<87:URENPA>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
Intertidal and subtidal Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis (Muller) often hi de among rocks or cover themselves with debris, including macroalgae, musse l shells, and pebbles. Similar reactions in other species of sea urchins ha ve been interpreted as a response to bright sunlight. This study examined t he response of S. droebachiensis specifically to ultraviolet radiation (UVR ). In laboratory studies using artificial irradiation, S. droebachiensis ex posed to UVR (290 to 400 nm) and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR, 400 to 700 nm) sought shade and covered themselves significantly more frequ ently than those exposed only to PAR. In outdoor aquaria, individuals were exposed to ambient solar radiation that was filtered to create 4 treatments (dark, PAR, PAR + UVA, or PAR + WA + UVB) and observed for 6 h as total so lar irradiance changed with time of day. Sea urchins covered themselves wit h significantly more material when exposed to PAR + UVA + UVB than in all o ther treatments, and in response to total irradiance. The amount of coverin g by sea urchins exposed to PAR + UVA (320 to 400 nm) varied over the cours e of the day, but were typically less than those exposed to UVB (295 to 320 nm). These sea urchins covered themselves more than those exposed to PAR a lone or held in the dark. Sea urchins exposed to PAR alone did not differ i n the amount of covering from those held in the dark, regardless of time of day. The amount of covering correlated significantly with WE and UVA irrad iance independently, but not PAR irradiance. This study does not rule out t hat multiple cues may cause the covering response, but it demonstrates that S. droebachiensis seeks shelter and covers itself in response to UVR, prim arily UVB wavelengths or a combination of WA and WE, presumably to avoid W- induced damage.