Multiphase reactors are widely used in petroleum, chemical, petrochemical,
pharmaceutical and metallurgical industries as well as in materials process
ing and pollution abatement. Most reactors of interest in industrial practi
ce (slurry bubble columns, gas-solid risers and fluidized beds, ebullated b
eds and stirred tanks) are opaque as they contain a large volume fraction o
f the dispersed phase. All the physical phenomena that affect the fluid dyn
amics of such systems are not yet entirely understood. This makes a priori
predictions of important process parameters (pressure drop, velocity and ho
ldup profiles, degree of backmixing, etc.) very difficult.
Industry relies on correlations, and these are prone to great uncertainty a
s one departs from the operating conditions contained in the available limi
ted data base. Prediction of the needed process parameters based on fundame
ntal fluid dynamic models would be most welcome, fyet even the best models
(that can treat large vessels or conduits that are of interest) require clo
sure forms for phase interaction terms which are still subject to uncertain
ty and debate. Hence, there is a need to verify such models; verification c
an only be accomplished if we measure precisely those quantities that we wo
uld like the model to ultimately predict, i.e. phase holdup and holdup prof
iles, velocity profiles, backmixing, etc. However, the systems are opaque a
nd we cannot "see" into them, and so it seems that a vicious circle has bee
n closed and that model predictions are destined to remain unchecked.
Fortunately, as two extensive recent reviews point out (Chaouki et al., 199
7a, 1997b) there are techniques which can provide us with the desired infor
mation. In this paper, we review two of them: gamma ray assisted tomography
(CT) for measurement of holdup profiles and computer aided radioactive par
ticle tracking (CARPT) for measurement of velocity profiles and backmixing
parameters. We then show how these techniques can be used to obtain informa
tion in systems with moving catalysts of industrial interest such as gas-so
lid riser, liquid-solid riser and gas-liquid bubble column.
The ability of the available CFD (Computational Fluid Dynamics) codes to co
rrectly predict the observed hydrodynamic quantities is also briefly discus
sed. We then address the issue of two-phase flow in packed beds and the evo
lution of the experimental techniques and models used to quantify these rea
ctors better. Finally, troubleshooting on industrial scale reactors and use
of tracer methods to accomplish this are briefly mentioned.