Goals are central to current treatments of work motivation, and goal commit
ment is a critical construct in understanding the relationship between goal
s and performance. Inconsistency in the measurement of goal commitment hind
ered early research in this area but the nine-item, self-report scale devel
oped by Hollenbeck, Williams, and Klein (1989b), and derivatives of that sc
ale, have become the most commonly used measures of goal commitment. Despit
e this convergence, a few authors, based on small sample studies, have rais
ed questions about the dimensionality of this measure. To address the confl
icting recommendations in the literature regarding what items to use in ass
essing goal commitment, the current study combines the results of 17 indepe
ndent samples and 2918 subjects to provide a more conclusive assessment by
combining meta-analytic and multisample confirmatory factor analytic techni
ques. This effort reflects the first combined use of these techniques to te
st a measurement model and allowed for the creation of a database substanti
ally larger than that of previously factor analyzed samples containing thes
e scale items. By mitigating sampling error, the results clarified a number
of debated issues that have arisen out of previous small sample factor ana
lyses and revealed a five-item scale that is unidimensional and equivalent
across measurement timing, goal origin, and task complexity. It is recommen
ded that this five-item scale be used in future research assessing goal com
mitment. (C) 2001 Academic Press.