Common pool resource (CPR) dilemmas constitute a class of social dilemmas i
n which equilibrium behavior results in Pareto deficient outcomes that are
not at all desirable by the group. We focus on a class of CPR dilemmas that
, in addition to strategic uncertainty about the harvesting behavior of the
other group members, include environmental uncertainty about the size of t
he CPR. In an attempt to decrease the rate of requests from the common pool
, and thereby increase individual payoffs, we extend previous research-both
theoretically and experimentally-in two different directions. In the bonus
treatment, a reward is given to the agent(s) who requests the least, and i
n the penalty treatment, a charge is imposed on the agent(s) who requests t
he most. We show that under equilibrium play the bonus treatment decreases
total group request, whereas the penalty treatment increases it. Our experi
mental results do not support this prediction. Rather, both treatments cons
iderably decrease the rate of request and, therefore, increase the rate of
provision. The penalty treatment is shown to be more effective in reducing
individual requests and enhancing provision rates than the bonus treatment.
(C) 2001 Academie Press.