Somatic-cell mutation induced by UVA and monochromatic UV radiation in repair-proficient and -deficient Drosophila melanogaster

Citation
T. Negishi et al., Somatic-cell mutation induced by UVA and monochromatic UV radiation in repair-proficient and -deficient Drosophila melanogaster, PHOTOCHEM P, 73(5), 2001, pp. 493-498
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Biochemistry & Biophysics
Journal title
PHOTOCHEMISTRY AND PHOTOBIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00318655 → ACNP
Volume
73
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
493 - 498
Database
ISI
SICI code
0031-8655(200105)73:5<493:SMIBUA>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Near-ultraviolet light (UVA: 320-400 nm) constitutes a major part of sunlig ht UV, It is important to know the effect of UVA on the biological activiti es of organisms on the earth. We have previously reported that black light induces somatic-cell mutation in Drosophila larvae, To investigate which wa velength of the UVA is responsible for the mutation we have now carried out a series of monochromatic irradiations (310, 320, 330, 340, 360, 380 and 4 00 nm) on Drosophila larvae, using the large spectrograph of the National I nstitute for Basic Biology (Okazaki National Research Institutes, Okazaki, Japan), Mutagenic activity was examined by the Drosophila wingspot test in which we observe mutant wing hair colonies (spots) on the wings of adult fl ies obtained from the treated larvae. The induction of mutation was highest by irradiation at 310 nm and decreased as the wavelength became longer. Ne ither the 380 nor the 400 nm light was mutagenic. Excision repair is known to protect cells from UV damage. In the excision-repair-deficient Drosophil a, the mutagenic response induced by 310 nm irradiation was 24-fold higher than that of the wild-type (7.2 +/- 1.5 spots/wing/kJ vs 0.3 +/- 0.08 spots /wing/kJ), and at 320 nm the difference of the response was 14-fold (0.21 v s 0.015 +/- 0.005). In the case of irradiation at 330 and 340 nm the differ ence of the response was only two-fold (at 330 nm, 6.9 +/- 2.9 x 10(-3) vs 3.1 +/- 1.1 x 10(-3) spots/wing/kJ; at 340 nm, 3.5 +/- 0.9 x 10(-3) vs 2.0 +/- 0.7 x 10(-3)). These results suggest that the lesion caused in the larv ae by 320 nm irradiation may be similar to the damage induced by 310 nm and that the lights of 330 and 340 nm may induce damage different from the les ions induced by shorter-wavelength lights.