The EEOC charge priority policy and claimants with psychiatric disabilities

Citation
Md. Ullman et al., The EEOC charge priority policy and claimants with psychiatric disabilities, PSYCH SERV, 52(5), 2001, pp. 644-649
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,"Clinical Psycology & Psychiatry
Journal title
PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES
ISSN journal
10752730 → ACNP
Volume
52
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
644 - 649
Database
ISI
SICI code
1075-2730(200105)52:5<644:TECPPA>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Objective: In June 1995 the U,S, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (E EOC) instituted a new charge priority policy, Under the new policy, charges are classified as one of three priority levels during or immediately after intake. Only charges assigned a high priority receive a full investigation , This paper examines the effect of the charge priority policy on individua ls with psychiatric disabilities who filed Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) charges with the EEOC. Methods: Using data extracted from the EEOC's charge data system, the authors analyzed all 66,298 ADA claims prioritized and closed between June 1995 and March 1998, The z test for difference in p roportions and the generalized estimating equations procedure were used. Th e primary outcome measure was the priority assignment received by ADA claim ants. Results: Charges that received a high priority assignment were more l ikely. to result in benefits for claimants. Charges filed by claimants with psychiatric disabilities were significantly less likely to be assigned a h igh priority than charges filed by other claimants, Claimants with psychiat ric disabilities were also significantly less likely to benefit from their claims. Conclusions: The strong relationship between being assigned high pr iority and receiving benefits as a result of filing a charge demonstrates t he importance of accurate priority categorization, The finding that people with psychiatric disabilities are less likely than others to benefit from t heir claims is cause for concern, particularly given the fact that the accu racy of the charge prioritization system has not been validated.