EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF NITRENDIPINE IN REDUCING A BOTH PRESSURE AND LEFT-VENTRICULAR MASS IN HYPERTENSIVE TYPE-2 DIABETIC-PATIENTS
R. Scognamiglio et al., EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF NITRENDIPINE IN REDUCING A BOTH PRESSURE AND LEFT-VENTRICULAR MASS IN HYPERTENSIVE TYPE-2 DIABETIC-PATIENTS, Diabetes care, 20(8), 1997, pp. 1290-1292
OBJECTIVE - To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of nitrendipine
in comparison with captopril in hypertensive diabetic patients with le
ft ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A tota
l of 75 patients enrolled in this study presented stable type 2 diabet
es (not treated with insulin) and mild-to-moderate hypertension with a
left ventricular mass greater than or equal to 75 g/m(2) by two-dimen
sional echocardiography. After a 4-week washout period, 38 patients we
re assigned to treatment with captopril, and 37 patients to nitrendipi
ne (random allocation). The duration of follow-up was 36 weeks. RESULT
S - Patients of both groups were similar with regard to the duration o
f diabetes and hypertension, systolic and diastolic blood pressure at
rest, degree of LVH, metabolic control, and albumin excretion rate (AE
R). Both drugs were equally effective in reducing systolic and diastol
ic blood pressure (captopril: from 165 +/- 13/100 +/- 4 to 147 +/- 11/
87 +/- 4 mmHg; nitrendipine: from 167 +/- 17/100 +/- 5 to 143 +/- 9/86
+/- 4 mmHg; P < 0.05) and in reversing LVH (nitrendipine: from 87 +/-
2 to 81 +/- 1 g/m(2); captopril: from 89 +/- 2 to 85 +/- 2 g/m(2); P
= 0.0001). Neither the left ventricular end-diastolic volume index nor
the left ventricular ejection fraction changed significantly during t
he treatment period. CONCLUSIONS - Nitrendipine is as effective as cap
topril in reducing both systolic and diastolic blood pressure and in r
eversing LVH. Neither drug showed any negative side effects on fasting
plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels, and both mai
ntained constant AERs.