In recent years there has been an increasing interest in water-alternating-
gas (WAG) processes, both miscible and immiscible. WAG injection is an oil
recovery method initially aimed to improve sweep efficiency during gas inje
ction. In some recent applications produced hydrocarbon gas has been reinje
cted in water-injection wells with the aim of improving oil recovery and pr
essure maintenance. Oil recovery by WAG injection has been attributed to co
ntact of unswept zones, especially recovery of attic or cellar oil by explo
iting the segregation of gas to the top or the accumulating of water toward
the bottom. Because the residual oil after gasflooding is normally lower t
han the residual oil after waterflooding, and three-phase zones may obtain
lower remaining oil saturation, WAG injection has the potential for increas
ed microscopic displacement efficiency. Thus, WAG injection can lead to imp
roved oil recovery by combining better mobility control and contacting unsw
ept zones, and by leading to improved microscopic displacement.
This study is a review of the WAG field experience as it is found in the li
terature today,(1-108) from the first reported WAG injection in 1957 in Can
ada to the new experience from the North Sea. About 60 fields have been rev
iewed. Both onshore and offshore projects have been included, as well as WA
G injections with hydrocarbon or nonhydrocarbon gases. Well spacing is very
different from onshore projects, where fine patterns often are applied, to
offshore projects, where well spacing is in the order of 1000 m.
For the fields reviewed, a common trend for the successful injections is an
increased oil recovery in the range of 5 to 10% of the oil initially in pl
ace (OIIP). Very few field trials have been reported as unsuccessful, but o
perational problems are often noted. Though the injectivity and production
problems are generally not detrimental for the WAG process, special attenti
on has been given to breakthrough of injected phases (water or gas). Improv
ed oil recovery by WAG injection is discussed as influenced by rock type, i
njection strategy, miscible/immiscible gas, and well spacing.