Study Design. Surface electromyographic reflex responses associated with me
chanical force, manually assisted (MFMA) spinal manipulative therapy were a
nalyzed in this prospective clinical investigation of 20 consecutive patien
ts with low back pain.
Objectives. To characterize and determine the magnitude of electromyographi
c reflex responses in human paraspinal muscles during high loading rate mec
hanical force, manually assisted spinal manipulative therapy of the thoraco
lumbar spine and sacroiliac joints.
Summary of Background Data. Spinal manipulative therapy has been investigat
ed for its effectiveness in the treatment of patients with low back pain, b
ut its physiologic mechanisms a re not well understood. Noteworthy is the f
act that spinal manipulative therapy has been demonstrated to produce consi
stent reflex responses in the back musculature; however, no study has exami
ned the extent of reflex responses in patients with low back pain.
Methods. Twenty patients (10 male and 10 female, mean age 43.0 years) under
went standard physical examination on presentation to an outpatient chiropr
actic clinic. After repeated isometric trunk extension strength tests, shor
t duration (<5 msec), localized posteroanterior manipulative thrusts were d
elivered to the sacroiliac joints, and L5, L4, L2, T12, and T8 spinous proc
esses and transverse processes. Surface, linear-enveloped electromyographic
(sEMG) recordings were obtained from electrodes located bilaterally over t
he L5 and L3 erector spinae musculature. Force-time and sEMG time histories
were recorded simultaneously to quantify the association between spinal ma
nipulative therapy mechanical and electromyographic response. A total of 16
00 sEMG recordings were analyzed from 20 spinal manipulative therapy treatm
ents, and comparisons were made between segmental level, segmental contact
point (spinous vs. transverse processes), and magnitude of the reflex respo
nse (peak-peak [p-p] ratio and relative mean sEMG). Positive sEMG responses
were defined as >2.5 p-p baseline sEMG output (>3.5% relative mean sEMG ou
tput). SEMG threshold was further assessed for correlation of patient self-
reported pain and disability.
Results. Consistent, but relatively localized, reflex responses occurred in
response to the localized, brief duration MFMA thrusts delivered to the th
oracolumbar spine and SI joints. The time to peak tension (sEMG magnitude)
ranged from 50 to 200 msec, and the reflex response times ranged from 2 to
4 msec, the latter consistent with intraspinal conduction times. Overall, t
he 20 treatments produced systematic and significantly different L5 and L3
sEMG responses, particularly for thrusts delivered to the lumbosacral spine
. Thrusts applied over the transverse processes produced more positive sEMG
responses (25.4%) in comparison with thrusts applied over the spinous proc
esses (20.6%). Left side thrusts and right side thrusts over the transverse
processes elicited positive contralateral L5 and L3 sEMG responses. When t
he data were examined across both treatment level and electrode site (L5 or
L3, L or R), 95% of patients showed positive sEMG response to MFMA thrusts
. Patients with frequent to constant low back pain symptoms tended to have
a more marked sEMG response in comparison with patients with occasional to
intermittent low back pain.
Conclusions. This is the first study demonstrating neuromuscular reflex res
ponses associated with MFMA spinal manipulative therapy in patients with lo
w back pain. Noteworthy was the finding that such mechanical stimulation of
both the paraspinal musculature (transverse processes) and spinous process
es produced consistent, generally localized sEMG responses. Identification
of neuromuscular characteristics, together with a comprehensive assessment
of patient clinical status, may provide for clarification of the significan
ce of spinalmaanipulative therapy in eliciting putative conservative therap
eutic benefits in patients with pain of musculoskeletal origin.