Background: Cystic duct stones (CDS) are occasionally encountered during la
paroscopic cholecystectomy (LC). They may be noticed during the dissection
of the cystic pedicle or seen to extrude from the cystic duct (CD) when it
is divided or opened to perform the intraoperative cholangiogram (IOC). The
procedures for dealing with CDS range from the simple removal of stones th
at fall out when the duct is opened to incising the duct over an impacted s
tone to facilitate its removal or converting to open surgery due to a large
stone in a CD adherent to the bile duct (e.g., Mirizzi syndrome). Therefor
e, we set out to establish criteria that might be predictive of CDS, to exa
mine the technical problems caused by them, to look for the most effective
ways of avoiding adverse consequences, especially the risk of missing bile
duct stones.
Methods: We performed a review and analysis of a database that included pre
operative, operative, and postoperative data for all patients treated at ou
r hospital who were found to have CDS.
Results: In a series of 520 LC performed over a period of 5 years, 64 cases
of CDS were documented (12.3%). The preoperative risk factors in 45 of the
se cases (70.3%) were recent sever acute pain with or without liver functio
n test (LFT) derangement (34.3%), jaundice (14%), pancreatitis (14%), and p
revious acute cholecystitis (7.8%). At operation, a single stone was found
in the CD in 64% of the cases; multiple stones were found in 36%. Dissectio
n of the pedicle was difficult in 21 cases and had to be carried out fundus
-first in four cases. The CD was reported to be wide in 18 cases; five of t
hem eventually needed to be closed with endoloops. Operative difficulty was
reported in three of 19 cases where there were no preoperative risk factor
s. Simple removal of the stones was possible in most cases. CDS needed be c
rushed, the CD incised, or the procedure converted to open in only five cas
es (7.8%). IOC was attempted in all cases; it was normal in 39 (61%) and fa
iled in two cases (3%). Eighteen patients (28%) were found to have bile duc
t stones: another five (7.8%) had CBD dilation or debris indicating possibl
e recent passage of stones. Fourteen transcystic and nine direct hilt: duct
explorations were performed.
Conclusion: Some CDS may slip from the gallbladder into the CD or the CBD d
uring dissection. Carefill retraction and manipulation should therefore: be
done to minimize this risk. Most CDS are easy to deal with, but some of th
em can result in increased operative difficulty. if IOC is not carried out
on a routine basis, it becomes mandatory if CDS are encountered because les
s than or equal to 35% of them may be associated with bile duct stones.