C. Langer et al., UltraCision or high-frequency knife in transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM)? Advantages of a new procedure, SURG ENDOSC, 15(5), 2001, pp. 513-517
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
The potential advantages of ultrasound dissection using UltraCision (UC), a
n ultrasonically activated scalpel, rather than conventional electrosurgery
(ES) were investigated retrospectively in 63 patients following transanal
endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) in 22 cases of rectal carcinoma (16 pT1, four
pT2, two pT3), 40 cases of rectal adenoma >2 cm, and one neurinoma. In all
, 21 patients (13 adenomas, seven carcinomas, and one neurinoma) were opera
ted with UltraCision (Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany), whereas 42 patients (
27 adenomas, 15 carcinomas) were treated with conventional electrocautery.
All tumors were completely excised (R0) in both groups. We encountered a to
tal of nine complications, seven after ES and two after UC use. Surgical re
intervention was necessary in three cases (4.7%), exclusively following res
ection by ES. There were five cases of tumor recurrence (7.9%), once again
only in the ES group. The advantages of ultrasound dissection are magnified
under the particular conditions of minimally invasive endoscopic rectum su
rgery by means of TEM. In principle, all the known risks associated with th
e application of electric current can be avoided by using ultrasound techno
logy.