Cost implications of low molecular weight heparins as prophylaxis following total hip and knee replacement

Citation
Gk. Bell et Sz. Goldhaber, Cost implications of low molecular weight heparins as prophylaxis following total hip and knee replacement, VASC MED, 6(1), 2001, pp. 23-29
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
VASCULAR MEDICINE
ISSN journal
1358863X → ACNP
Volume
6
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
23 - 29
Database
ISI
SICI code
1358-863X(200102)6:1<23:CIOLMW>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are serious and co stly complications of total hip and knee replacement surgery. The risk of t hese complications is significantly reduced by prophylaxis. Low molecular w eight heparins (LMWH) are being used for this indication with increased fre quency. The objective of this study was to assess the cost implications of LMWH for the prevention of symptomatic DVT and PE complications following t otal hip and knee replacement surgery. The study design was cost analysis b ased on utilization and the costs of medical resources for prophylaxis and treatment of DVT/PE. A retrospective hospital data set was used to assess s ymptomatic DVT/PE complication rates and medical resource utilization in pa tients receiving warfarin, other, and no prophylaxis. The results of a clin ical trial were used to estimate relative reductions in risk of symptomatic DVT/PE due to prophylaxis with LMWH. The 7721 total hip and knee replaceme nt patients analyzed were admitted in 1992 in 57 acute-care non-federal hos pitals. The measurements were of incremental costs or charges expected to b e saved as a result of using LMWH prophylaxis instead of warfarin prophylax is. Prophylaxis using LMWH rather than warfarin reduces the expected total costs (charges) of treatment by $50 ($193), not including the pharmaceutica l costs associated with prophylaxis. The cost reduction in favor of LMWH wa s sensitive to several factors, including blood monitoring costs and DVT/PE complication rates. Where a reduction of one day in hospital stay could be realized from LMWH's early onset of action, the cost (charges) reduction i ncreased to $226($624). In conclusion, LMWH has the potential to offer seve ral short- and long-term cost advantages compared with warfarin, mostly due to lower test costs associated with prophylaxis and reduced complication r ates.