Ja. Johnston et al., Environment-dependent performance and fitness of Iris brevicaulis, I-fulva(Iridaceae), and hybrids, AM J BOTANY, 88(5), 2001, pp. 933-938
We tested the relative fitness of two Louisiana Iris species (Iris brevicau
lis and I. fulva) and their first-generation backcross hybrids in three exp
erimental watering treatments: dry, field capacity, and hooded. Leaf area e
xpansion rate, gas exchange (A(max), g(s), c(i)), and biomass at final harv
est were measured for each species and hybrid class in ail three environmen
tal treatments. Fitness (based on total biomass) of the four genotypic clas
ses differed significantly with environment. All genotypic classes performe
d most poorly in the dry treatment. The fitness ranking of genotypic class
also changed across environments (significant genotypic class by treatment
interaction) with hybrid genotype fitness shifting relative to parental gen
otypes. Integrating over all treatments. backcrosses to I. fulva showed the
lowest fitness, whereas backcrosses to I. brevicaulis outperformed I. fulv
a. The differences in fitness were apparently achieved by a combination of
differences in photosynthesis and allocation. In this system, hybrids are n
ot necessarily less fit than their parents, and the relationship between hy
brid and parental fitness is influenced by environmental conditions, lendin
g support to the Hybrid Novelty model of hybrid zone evolution.