A randomized, double-blind comparison of beclomethasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol and fluticasone propionate

Citation
A. Fairfax et al., A randomized, double-blind comparison of beclomethasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol and fluticasone propionate, ANN ALLER A, 86(5), 2001, pp. 575-582
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease
Journal title
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY
ISSN journal
10811206 → ACNP
Volume
86
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
575 - 582
Database
ISI
SICI code
1081-1206(200105)86:5<575:ARDCOB>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Background: Inhaled corticosteroids provide first-line treatment for asthma . An advance to improve potency was to produce new molecules with increased glucocorticoid receptor affinity (eg, fluticasone propionate [FP]). An alt ernative is to deliver more medication to both the large and small airway i nflammation of asthma by using an extrafine aerosol (eg, beclomethasone dip ropionate extrafine aerosol [BDP-extrafine]). Objective: To demonstrate clinical equivalence of BDP-extrafine (400 mug da ily) and FP (400 mug daily) in symptomatic asthmatic patients over the cour se of 6 weeks. Methods: This was a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter , 6-week study in adults with asthma taking conventional FP 1010 to 250 mug daily or equivalent, and displaying signs/symptoms of active disease requi ring additional therapy. Results: Eighty-eight patients were randomized to BDP-extrafine (and FP-pla cebo) and 84 to FP (and BDP-placebo). There were no significant differences between treatments with respect to symptom control, as evidenced by mean c hange from baseline in percentage days without asthma symptoms/nights witho ut sleep disturbance observed at weeks 1 to 2, 3 to 4, or 5 to 6. Mean chan ges from baseline in AM PEFR at weeks 5 to 6 for BDP-extrafine (19.0) and F P (30.5) were equivalent (P = 0.022 for equivalence). There were significan t (P < 0.001) within-treatment-group differences in mean change from baseli ne in AM PEFR at weeks 1 to 2 for both treatments. There was no difference in the incidence of patients reporting at least one adverse event during th e study (BDP-extrafine 41%; FP 37%). Mean percentage change from baseline f or AM plasma cortisol at week 6 was +17.7% for BDP-extrafine and +4.2% for FP (P = 0.066 for difference). Conclusions: BDP-extrafine and FP at doses of 400 <mu>g daily provided equi valent asthma control in patients with symptomatic asthma and exhibited sim ilar safety profiles.