Background. Aortic root re-replacement is being performed with increased fr
equency. Limited information is available regarding the surgical approaches
and clinical outcomes of this reoperation.
Methods. Between May 1980 and May 1999, 31 patients (mean age, 45 +/- 15 ye
ars) underwent redo composite replacement of the aortic valve and ascending
aorta. Indications for reoperation were prosthetic valve endocarditis in 1
2 patients (39%), failed biological valve in 17 (55%), and false aneurysm i
n 2 (6%). At reoperation, mechanical valves were implanted in 24 patients a
nd biologic valves in 7. All patients with endocarditis had annular abscess
and required reconstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract before i
mplantation of a new valved conduit. Mechanical valves were used in 24 pati
ents, aortic homograft in 4, and bioprosthetic valves in 3. The coronary bu
tton technique was used to reimplant the coronary arteries whenever possibl
e. Extension of one or both coronary arteries with a short segment of saphe
nous vein or a synthetic graft was used in 16 patients 152%). The aortic ar
ch was replaced in 7 patients (23%).
Results. There was one operative death (3%) because of rupture of an abdomi
nal aortic aneurysm. The mean follow-up was 47 +/- 46 months and was 100% c
omplete. There were five late deaths (16%), three of which were cardiac rel
ated. The actuarial survival was 71% +/- 12% at 5 years. Three patients exp
erienced recurrent prosthetic valve endocarditis 4 months to 8 years after
operation. The 8-year freedom from endocarditis for patients operated on fo
r endocarditis was 82% +/- 11% compared with 100% for those operated on for
other reasons (p = 0.1). At the last follow-up, 21 of 25 survivors (84%) w
ere in New York Heart Association functional classes I or II, and 4 were in
class III.
Conclusions. Redo aortic root replacement can be performed with good early
and late results. Patients operated on for prosthetic root endocarditis may
have an increased risk of recurrent late endocarditis. (Ann Thorac Surg 20
01;71:1460-3) (C) 2001 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.