Behavioral teratology/toxicology: How do we know what we know?

Authors
Citation
Rt. Brown, Behavioral teratology/toxicology: How do we know what we know?, ARCH CLIN N, 16(4), 2001, pp. 389-402
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY
ISSN journal
08876177 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
389 - 402
Database
ISI
SICI code
0887-6177(200105)16:4<389:BTHDWK>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Knowledge about human behavioral teratology/toxicology must necessarily be limited by the methods that can ethically be used. Research in the field is an enterprise calling for tolerance for uncertainty if not chaos. Among th e main points of this paper are: (a) Kaufman's criticisms of research on lo w blood-lead level (BLL) and children's IQ are generally valid and apply to virtually all human natural-groups research; (b) Relative to some contexts , research on low BLL on children's IQ is exemplary; (c) Relative to other contexts, the conclusion that low BLL have linear effects is well supported ; (d) Owing to necessary design limitations, all natural-groups studies hav e shortcomings; (e) Inference of causality is uncertain under any condition s; and (f) Some authors readily leap from molehills of data to mountains of causal conclusions. (C) 2001 National Academy of Neuropsychology. Publishe d by Elsevier Science Ltd.