Deep vein thrombosis and its prevention in critically ill adults

Citation
J. Attia et al., Deep vein thrombosis and its prevention in critically ill adults, ARCH IN MED, 161(10), 2001, pp. 1268-1279
Citations number
99
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00039926 → ACNP
Volume
161
Issue
10
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1268 - 1279
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-9926(20010528)161:10<1268:DVTAIP>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Background: Our objective was to systematically review the incidence of dee p vein thrombosis (DVT) and the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis in criticall y ill adults, including patients admitted to intensive care units and follo wing trauma, neurosurgery, or spinal cord injury. Methods: Two authors independently searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, abst ract data bases, and the Cochrane database. Data were extracted independently in trip licate. Results: Ten percent to 30% of medical and surgical intensive care unit pat ients develop DVT within the first week of intensive care unit admission. T he use of subcutaneous low-dose heparin reduced the rate by 50% compared wi th no prophylaxis. Approximately 60% of trauma patients developed DVT withi n the first 2 weeks of admission. Use of unfractionated heparin appears to decrease the incidence of DVT by only 20%, whereas low molecular-weight hep arin decreases the incidence by a further 30%. The estimated prevalence of DVT in neurosurgical patients not given prophylaxis is 22% to 35%. Mechanic al prophylaxis is efficacious, with a pooled odds ratio in 5 randomized tri als of 0.28. Use of low-molecular-weight heparin has been investigated as a n adjunct to mechanical prophylaxis with a pooled odds ratio of 0.59 compar ed with graduated compression stockings alone. The incidence of DVT without prophylaxis in acute spinal cord injury patients is likely in excess of 50 % to 80%. Studies of prophylaxis in these patients are too sparse to come t o any definitive conclusion. Conclusions: Critically ill patients commonly develop DVT, with rates that vary from 22% to almost 80%, depending on patient characteristics. Methods of prophylaxis proven in one group do not necessarily generalize to other c ritically ill patient soups. More potent prophylactic regimens other than u nfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparins alone may be needed with hig her-risk groups.