Oral mucolytic drugs for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review

Citation
Pj. Poole et Pn. Black, Oral mucolytic drugs for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review, BR MED J, 322(7297), 2001, pp. 1271-1274
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
ISSN journal
0959535X → ACNP
Volume
322
Issue
7297
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1271 - 1274
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-535X(20010526)322:7297<1271:OMDFEO>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Objective To assess the effects of oral mucolytics in adults with stable ch ronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Design Systematic review of randomised controlled trials that compared at l east two months of regular oral mucolytic drugs with placebo. Studies Twenty three randomised controlled trials in outpatients in Europe and United States. Main outcome measures Exacerbations, days of illness, lung function, advers e events. Results Compared with placebo, the number of exacerbations was si gnificantly reduced in subjects taking oral mucolytics (weighted mean diffe rence -0.07 per month, 95% confidence interval -0.08 to -0.05, P < 0.0001). Based on the annualised rate of exacerbations in the control subjects of 2 .7 a year, this is a 29% reduction. The number needed to treat for one subj ect to have no exacerbation in the study period would be 6. Days of illness also fell (weighted mean difference -0.56, -0.77 to -0.35, P < 0.0001). Th e number of subjects who had no exacerbations in the Study period was great er in the mucolytic group (odds ratio 2.22, 95% confidence interval 1.93 to 2.54, P < 0.0001). There was no difference in lung function or in adverse events reported between treatments. Conclusions In chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease , treatment with mucolytics is associated with a reduction in acute exacerb ations and days of illness. As these drugs have to be taken long term, they could be most useful in patients who have repeated, prolonged, or severe e xacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.