Nearly impossible to evidence with classical paraffin sections, chondroid t
issue is regularly absent in the chapters of texbooks dealing,vith skeletal
growth in which however it represents one of the major constituents. Micro
radiograph and methylene blue surface staining of thick undecalcified secti
ons are the most suitable methods to reveal the presence of chondroid tissu
e. Moreover, all the methods used clearly indicate that this tissue is diff
erent from both calcified cartilage and woven bone oi lamellar bone. The si
multaneous presence, within the chondroid tissue matrix, of collagen type I
, specific for bone tissue, and type II, specific for cartilage enables als
o to distinguish chondroid tissue from all the other calcified tissues. The
presence of chondroid tissue in both fetal mandibular symphysis and in the
sutural spaces of the skull strongly suggests that the same biomechanical
stresses have the same consequences, i.e. the growth of the tongue separate
s the hemimandibles and the development of the brain has the same effect on
the sutural areas Experimental production of chondroid tissue is obtained
in the space appeared between the bone fragments submit ted to a continuous
distraction. Finally, since the first cranial vault is also constituted by
chondroid tissue islets, it has to be concluded that bone tissue if always
secondary in its origin, i.e.. after hyaline cartilage in endochondral oss
ification find after chondroid tissue in membranous ossification.