Human Resource Management is seemingly one of the last fields still looking
for "one best way" approaches. French authors Pichault and Nizet propose t
o break from this tradition with a new theory of HRM which tries to accommo
date the diversity and mutations of today's society and organizational cont
exts. They found their work on Mintzberg's celebrated 1982 "typology of org
anizational forms," which they link to an actor-based perspective borrowed
from Crozier and Friedberg's 1976 "strategic analysis". The authors bridge
these two a priori contradictory approaches through the theory of organizat
ional goals. Five HRM models are identified. The end result is that efficie
nt HRM is not only contingent on organizational contexts, it also takes int
o account the actors' interpretations, thus adding a typically political di
mension to the framework. As such, Pichault and Nizet's perspective departs
from most mainstream North American work. It is not without weaknesses, ho
wever: For example, it still lacks a fully-fledged theory of coordination,
a fault found with Mintzberg and with Crozier and Friedberg.
Nevertheless, the approach has had practical applications. It is used in or
ganizational consulting as well as in the classroom. Richly illustrated wit
h cases, it can be very useful as a teaching strategy, as one of the review
ers has discovered. One if its great benefits is to help students and pract
itioners detect double bind situations and their personal and organizationa
l consequences. Consequently, it is also of great value as a heuristics for
fieldwork and the analysis of concrete organizational situations.