Hh. Eckstein et al., Grading of internal carotid artery stenosis: Validation of Doppler/duplex ultrasound criteria and angiography against endarterectomy specimen, EUR J VAS E, 21(4), 2001, pp. 301-310
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
Objectives: duplex ultrasound has replaced angiography prior to carotid end
arterectomy (CEA) in many institutions. However, the indications for CEA ar
e based on angiographically controlled studies and widely accepted ultrasou
nd criteria do not exist. Consequently the reliability of Doppler and/or du
plex ultrasound to predict a high-grade ICA stenosis has to be proven.
Design: prospective validation study.
Materials: one hundred and fifty carotid bifurcations assessed by ultrasoun
d and selective angiography and 68 acrylat outcasts of carotid specimen aft
er eversion CEA.
Methods: ICA stenosis was measured angiographically according to the ECST c
riteria. Combined Doppler acoustic standard criteria (CDASC), peak systolic
frequency (PSF), peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (
EDV) served as criteria for the ultrasound assessment. These criteria and t
he results of angiography were compared to the degree of ICA stenosis deter
mined by specimen measurements.
Results: the median degree of ICA stenosis as assessed by angiography (82%,
range 56-97%) and CDASC (83%, range 50-99%) corresponded well to the speci
men measurements (80%, range 50-95%). The sensitivity of angiography and CD
ASC to predict a 70-90% ICA stenosis (ECST criteria) compared to the specim
en measurements was 88% and 95%, respectively. The positive predictive valu
e (PPV) reached 92% and 96%, respectively. CDSCA were equivalent to angiogr
aphy and were superior to the best single frequency or velocity parameters.
If CDASC do not indicate a greater than or equal to 70% ICA stenosis in sp
ite of a PSV greater than or equal to 180 cm/s and/or an EDV greater than o
r equal to 50 cm/s, angiography may detect patients with a > 70% ICA stenos
is.
Conclusions: CDASC are valid in the quantification of high-grade ICA stenos
is. They are more reliable than single velocity and/or frequency measuremen
ts. However, if velocity criteria and CDASC do not agree, angiography shoul
d be performed.