Two general patterns that have emerged from the intense studies on insect-h
ost plant associations are a predominance of specialists over generalists a
nd a taxonomic conservatism in host plant use. In most insect-host plant sy
stems, explanations for these patterns must be based on biases in the proce
sses of host colonizations, host shifts, and specialization, rather than co
speciation. In the present paper, we investigate changes in host range in t
he nymphalid butterfly tribe Nymphalini, using parsimony optimizations of h
ost-plant data on the butterfly phylogeny. In addition, we performed larval
establishment tests to search for larval capacity to feed and survive on p
lants that have been lost from the female egg-laying repertoire. Optimizati
ons suggested an ancestral association with Urticaceae, and most of the tes
ted species showed a capacity to feed on Urtica dioica regardless of actual
host-plant use. In addition, there was a bias among the successful establi
shments on nonhosts toward plants that are used as hosts by other species i
n the Nymphalini. An increased likelihood of colonizing ancestral or relate
d plants could also provide an alternative explanation for the observed pat
tern that some plant families appear to have been colonized independently s
everal times in the tribe. We also show that there is no directionality in
host range evolution toward increased specialization, that is, specializati
on is not a dead end. Instead, changes in host range show a very dynamic pa
ttern.