Infection control dogma: Top 10 suspects

Citation
Lp. Manangan et al., Infection control dogma: Top 10 suspects, INFECT CONT, 22(4), 2001, pp. 243-247
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
ISSN journal
0899823X → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
243 - 247
Database
ISI
SICI code
0899-823X(200104)22:4<243:ICDT1S>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
As infection control evolved into an art and science through the years, man y infection control practices have become infection control dogmas (princip les, beliefs, ideas, or opinions). In this "Reality Check" session of the 4 th Decennial International Conference on Nosocomial and Healthcare-Associat ed Infections, we assessed participants' perceptions of prevalent infection control dogmas. The majority of participants agreed with all dogmas having evidence of efficacy, except for the dogma on the frequency of changing me chanical-ventilator tubing. In contrast, the majority of participants disag reed with dogmas not having evidence of efficacy, except for the dogma on p erineal care, umbilical cord care, and reminder signs for isolation precaut ion, As for controversial dog mas, many of the responses were almost evenly distributed between "agree" and "disagree." Infection control professional s were knowledgeable about evidence-based infection control practices. Howe ver, many of the respondents still believe in some of the non-evidence-base d dogmas.