Provider assessment of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy

Citation
Dr. Bangsberg et al., Provider assessment of adherence to HIV antiretroviral therapy, J ACQ IMM D, 26(5), 2001, pp. 435-442
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease",Immunology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES
ISSN journal
15254135 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
435 - 442
Database
ISI
SICI code
1525-4135(20010415)26:5<435:PAOATH>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Background: Adherence assessment is an essential component of monitoring HI V antiretroviral therapy. Prior studies suggest that medical providers freq uently estimate individual patient adherence inaccurately. Objective: We compared provider estimates of nonadherence to antiretroviral therapy with unannounced pill counts and structured patient interviews to determine the accuracy of adherence information obtained by providers and p atients. Design, Setting, and participants: Comparison of three adherence measures i n homeless or marginally housed persons receiving HIV antiretroviral therap y (n = 45) and their providers (n = 35). Measurements: Provider estimate of percentage of pills taken: three success ive patient structured reports of number of doses missed in the last 3 days : and three successive unannounced pill counts. Results: 13% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4%-22%) of patients were not fo llowing their regimen as directed. Provider-adherence estimate explained on ly 26% (95% CI, 6%-47%) of the variation in pill count adherence, whereas p atient report explained 72% (95% CI, 52%-96%). The sensitivity and specific ity of provider estimates of nonadherence. defined as <80% of pills taken b y pill count. were 40% and 85%, respectively. The sensitivity and specifici ty of patient interview were 72% and 95%. respectively. Conclusions: Provider estimate of adherence was inaccurate whereas structur ed patient report was more closely related to pill count. Structured assess ment over several short intervals may improve accuracy of adherence assessm ent in clinical practice.