Importance of CD34(+) cell subsets in autologous PBSC transplantation: theMulhouse experience using CD34(+)CD38(-) cells as predictive tool for hematopoietic engraftment
P. Henon et al., Importance of CD34(+) cell subsets in autologous PBSC transplantation: theMulhouse experience using CD34(+)CD38(-) cells as predictive tool for hematopoietic engraftment, J BIOL REG, 15(1), 2001, pp. 62-67
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL REGULATORS AND HOMEOSTATIC AGENTS
Over the years, various biological parameters have been proposed for predic
ting rapidity and long term maintenance of hematopoietic engraftment after
peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), Determination of the gr
aft content in CFU-GM was the only one available until the end of the eight
ies. But, for technical reasons, and also because it does not actually eval
uate the self-renewal potential of the cell products reinfused, it has now
been commonly replaced by the determination of CD34(+) cell amounts, which
are known to contain the pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells. However, a f
requent discrepancy still exists between the number of CD34(+) cells reinfu
sed and the engraftment efficiency. We have recently demonstrated a higher
accuracy of the numbers of CD34(+)38(-) cells contained in graft products t
o predict rapidity of trilineage engraftment, which has further been confir
med by other investigators. Furthermore, we and others, have proposed a thr
eshold dose of 5 x 10(4) CD34(+)38(-) cells/kg b.w. below which the triline
age engraftment kinetics are significantly slower and unpredictible. This "
cut-off" value also appears to be a realistic clinical tool to decide if he
matopoietic growth factor(s) must be administered or not after PBSCT Indeed
, when for example, rh-G-CSF administration after transplant of CD34(+)38(-
) amounts < 5 x 10(4) kg has indisputable positive effects on the rapidity
of neutrophil engraftment, length of hospitalization and posttransplant cos
ts, enough to make it fully justified in this situation, it is absolutely n
ot the case when it is administered after reinfusion of CD34(+)38(-) cell a
mounts > 5 x 10(4) /kg. In this case, posttransplant rh-G-CSF administratio
n could even result in a decrease in stem cells with self-renewal potential
of the graft, which should still raise more concerns for its indiscriminat
e and costly use.