E. Itoi et al., Position of immobilization after dislocation of the glenohumeral joint - Astudy with use of magnetic resonance imaging, J BONE-AM V, 83A(5), 2001, pp. 661-667
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine","da verificare
Background: Glenohumeral dislocations often recur, probably because a Banka
rt lesion does not heal sufficiently during the period of immobilization. U
sing magnetic resonance imaging, we assessed the position of the Bankart le
sion, with the arm in internal and external rotation, in shoulders that had
had a dislocation.
Methods: Coaptation of a Bankart lesion was examined with use of magnetic r
esonance imaging, with the arm held at the side of the trunk and positioned
first in internal rotation (mean, 29 degrees) and then in external rotatio
n (mean, 35 degrees), in nineteen shoulders. Six shoulders (six patients) h
ad had an initial anterior dislocation, and thirteen shoulders (twelve pati
ents) had had recurrent anterior dislocation. Fast-spin-echo T2-weighted ax
ial images were made when the dislocation had occurred less than two weeks
earlier, and spin-echo T1-weighted axial images after intra-articular injec
tion of gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid were made when the d
islocation had occurred more than two weeks earlier. Separation and displac
ement of the anteroinferior portion of the labrum from the glenoid rim were
measured on the axial images, and coaptation of the anterior part of the c
apsule to the glenoid neck was assessed by measurement of the detached area
, opening angle, and detached length.
Results: Separation and displacement of the labrum were both significantly
less (p = 0.0047 and p = 0.0017, respectively) when the arm was in external
rotation than when it was in internal rotation. The detached area and the
opening angle of the anteroinferior portion of the capsule were both signif
icantly smaller (p = 0.0003 and p < 0.0001, respectively), and the detached
length was significantly shorter (p < 0.0001) with the arm in external rot
ation.
Conclusion: Immobilization of the arm in external rotation better approxima
tes the Bankart lesion to the glenoid neck than does the conventional posit
ion of internal rotation.