Dynamics and steady-state properties of photorefractive poly(N-vinylcarbazole)-based composites sensitized with (2,4,7-trinitro-9-fluorenylidene)malononitrile in a 0-3 wt % range
D. Van Steenwinckel et al., Dynamics and steady-state properties of photorefractive poly(N-vinylcarbazole)-based composites sensitized with (2,4,7-trinitro-9-fluorenylidene)malononitrile in a 0-3 wt % range, J CHEM PHYS, 114(21), 2001, pp. 9557-9564
This paper reports on the characterization of six low-T-g poly(N-vinylcarba
zole)-based photorefractive (PR) composites sensitized with (2,4,7-trinitro
-9-fluorenylidene)-malononitrile (TNFM) in different concentrations, rangin
g from 0 to 3 wt %. At 780 nm, two-beam coupling gain coefficients, four-wa
ve mixing diffraction efficiencies, and photoconductivities were measured v
ersus electric field, writing beam intensity, and temperature. Dynamic meas
urements pointed out that chromophore reorientation is not rate-limiting in
any of the six samples. In samples with sensitizer concentrations up to 1.
24 wt %, increasing the sensitizer concentration leads to a faster grating
buildup through a faster charge generation. The grating buildup in these sa
mples is rate- limited by the photogeneration speed. We provide evidence th
at the TNFM- anions, formed by photoreduction of TNFM, can act as a trap, s
imilar to what has been observed in C-60-sensitized samples. As a result, a
bove 1.49 wt % of TNFM, the larger amount of traps produced by photoreducti
on of the sensitizer reduces the mobility of the charges. Then, the grating
buildup speed becomes mobility limited, and smaller buildup rates are obse
rved. Except for the sample with 3 wt % TNFM, increased writing beam intens
ities or sensitizer concentrations give rise to a larger dynamic range. The
different behavior of the sample with the largest sensitizer concentration
is explained theoretically in terms of the trap density. The PR phase shif
ts were found to decrease with increasing writing beam intensity or sensiti
zer concentration. This provides evidence that the PR phase shifts are cont
rolled by the charge mobility rather than by the photogeneration efficiency
. PR measurements as a function of temperature and electric field evolve as
predicted by theory. (C) 2001 American Institute of Physics.