We consider procedures where issues of varying importance and risk are nego
tiated in stages. Negotiation at any stage requires an agreement at each pr
evious stage. If negotiation terminates, players realize the benefits from
all earlier agreements. We formalize this process by a strategic n-stage ne
gotiation game. The expected subgame-perfect equilibrium outcome is charact
erized by an intuitive, compact formula, which aggregates all the structura
l elements of the multi-stage process. We describe the optimal negotiation
agenda for a given decomposition of the bargaining problem, and we derive i
ntuitive prescriptions for an optimal decomposition. (C) 2001 Elsevier Scie
nce B.V. All rights reserved.