Suppose that rival downstream producers of a final good contract with the s
ame upstream supplier of an input and, in the process, reveal private infor
mation. A vertical merger between the upstream supplier and one of the down
stream firms maya dissipate the information advantage of the remaining down
stream firms. The welfare consequences of such a merger and related informa
tion sharing depend on the value of information, the benefits of integratio
n aprt from information sharing, and the nature of upstream competition. In
this paper, conditions are found under which owners of a vertically integr
ated fir are better off breaking up into independent firms. This result may
explain AT&T's recent spinoff of Lucent Technologies. Further results sugg
est that a prohibition on information transfers, such as that often propose
d by the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice as a precursor
to approving vertical mergers, may actually reduce expected consumer surplu
s and expected social welfare.