By tradition - and for historical reasons - reflex pathways and interneuron
es have been named by their dominating sensory input. Later studies have de
monstrated that each individual interneurone, as a rule, receives a broad c
onvergence from a large variety of sensory modalities, as well as inputs fr
om one or more descending tracts. It is thus possible that the traditional
nomenclature inadvertently has served as a 'straightjacket' for conceptual
development in this field. Indeed, there is now much evidence in favour of
the view that the many classes of spinal interneurones may be seen as 'func
tional units' representing different levels of muscle synergies, parts of m
ovements, or even more integrated motor behaviour. Each 'functional units'
maybe used by (different) descending pathways to mediate the motor commands
from the brain and integrate the appropriate (multimodal) sensory feedback
into the central command. A given sensory stimulus would then be able to a
ffect the motor output through a number of parallel, or alternative, segmen
tal pathways belonging to different 'functional units'. If this were correc
t it would indeed be predicted, rather than coming as a surprise, that a gi
ven sensory stimulus can result in different outputs - even with a differen
t sign - depending on the preceding selection of active 'functional units',
i.e. the type of motor activity initiated by the brain.