Estimation of seasonal and annual evaporation using agrometeorological data from the Thai meteorological department by the heat budget models
Citation
T. Hirota, Estimation of seasonal and annual evaporation using agrometeorological data from the Thai meteorological department by the heat budget models, J METEO JPN, 79(1B), 2001, pp. 365-371
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
SICI code
0026-1165(200103)79:1B<365:EOSAAE>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Seasonal evaporation on bare soil and lawn was estimated using only routine
meteorological data at Bangkok and Chiang Mai in the Chao Phraya river bas
in in Thailand by using two methods. One method is that evaporation was est
imated by the heat balance model using daily mean ground surface temperatur
e (0 cm depth), (hereafter GST). The second is that it was estimated by usi
ng the Force-Restore Method for estimating daily mean soil temperature (her
eafter FRM). Seasonal and annual evaporation were estimated by using agrome
teorological station data of the Thai Meteorological Department in 1989 at
Chiang Mai (lawn) and Bangkok (bare soil). At Chiang Mai, annual precipitat
ion was 1000 mm, annual pan evaporation was 1540 mm and estimated value of
annual evaporation (lawn) was 760 mm by the FRM (using soil temperature at
5 cm depth) and 815 mm by the GST method. At Bangkok, annual precipitation
was 1320 mm, annual pan evaporation was 1560 mm and the estimated value of
annual evaporation (bare soil) was 1080 mm by the FRM (using soil temperatu
re st 5 cm depth) and 1140 mm by the GST method. The results of these two m
ethods were comparatively close to each other, however the estimated evapor
ation by the GST method was slightly larger than that by the FRM. This diff
erence was caused by the differences between the ground surface temperature
and soil temperature at 5 cm depth. The reason considered was the difficul
ty of accurate ground surface temperature measurement by the stem thermomet
er. The estimated evaporation at Chiang Mai was comparatively close to the
results of the complex area of vegetation obtained by Toda et al. (2000b) a
nd paddy field obtained by Toda et al. (2000a).