In classical White's effect, intermediate-luminance targets appear lighter
when they interrupt the dark stripes of a grating and darker when they inte
rrupt the light stripes. The effect is reversed when targets are of double-
increment or double-decrement luminance, relative to the luminances of grat
ing stripes. To find a common explanation for classical and inverted effect
s, we ran two experiments. In experiment 1, we utilised intermediate-target
displays to show that perceived transparency dominates over occlusion only
when the target luminance is close to the luminances of top regions. This
result weakens transparency-based accounts of White's effect. In experiment
2, we varied grating contrast and target luminance to measure the classica
l effect in seven intermediate-target cases, as well as the inverted effect
in four double-increment and four double-decrement cases, Both types of ef
fect are explained by a common model, based on assimilation to the top regi
on and contrast with the interrupted region, weighted by adjacency along th
e luminance continuum.