Stacking-fault energies in MoSi2 due to shear along [331] have been calcula
ted by ab-initio and modified embedded-atom method (MEAM) calculations. The
results are used to investigate the configurations of 1/2 [331] dislocatio
ns and their mobility. Shear of 1/6 [331] in the {103} plane of MoSi2 produ
ces an antiphase boundary (APB) whose geometry, called APB(1), is different
from that produced by 1/6 [331] in the opposite direction, APB(2). MEAM ca
lculations show that APB(1) is stable while both types of calculation show
that APB(2) is unstable. Both ab-initio and MEAM calculations show that the
re is a stable fault close to APB(2) with a displacement of about 1/8 [331]
in the same direction. The calculations also show that there is a stable f
ault in the {110} plane with a displacement of 1/4 [111]. The identical fau
lt is produced by a shear of 1/4 [331]. There is good agreement between the
fault energies calculated by the two methods and also with the experimenta
l value (200-370 mJ m(2)). The agreement between the calculated fault energ
ies in the {013} plane is not so good. One factor is that the relaxation pr
ocedures are different; the MEAM method has more flexibility as well as a l
arger number of atoms, possibly explaining why it gives lower stable fault
energies. The {103} planes have an unusual five-layer ABCDE stacking sequen
ce with successive planes offset by 1/5 [301]. Shear of 1/10 [351] in the c
orrect direction gives a low-energy fault with Mo atoms surrounded by the c
orrect number (ten) of Si nearest neighbours. This vector is close to the 1
/8 [331] shear that produces a stable fault and may explain its low calcula
ted energy. Various dissociated configurations of 1/2 [331] dislocations ar
e considered on the basis of 1/6 [331], 1/8 [331], 1/4 [331] and 1/10 [351]
partials. All can have asymmetrical arrangements which will respond differ
ently to the direction of the applied stress, explaining why {103} [331] sl
ip is much easier for crystals compressed along [100] than along [001].