Go. Matheson et al., FORCE OUTPUT AND ENERGY-METABOLISM DURING NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION - A P-31-NMR STUDY, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine, 29(3), 1997, pp. 175-180
The purpose of this study was to determine the acute physiologic effec
ts of two electrical stimulation protocols commonly used for muscle re
habilitation, Surface electrodes were used to provide 12 stimulations
of the calf musculature, In protocol A the duty cycle was fixed at 1:1
(10-second stimulation: 10-second rest); far protocol B it was 1:5 (I
O-second stimulation :50-second rest), We continuously recorded isomet
ric plantarflexor force in six healthy male subjects during stimulatio
n using a load cell connected to a foot pedal ergometer. Metabolic cha
nges in the stimulated gastrocnemius muscle mere monitored in the supi
ne position using P-31-NMR spectroscopy (Phillips 1.5 tesla NMR machin
e), Relative changes in phosphocreatine (PCr), inorganic phosphate (Pi
), and intracellular pH (pH(i)) were obtained during stimulation and r
ecovery, using a 1.5 cm RF surface antenna, Over the 12 stimulations,
protocol A produced a significantly (p < 0.001), greater force decline
(protocol A: 30.4 +/- 1.3%, protocol B: 13 +/- 0.8%); a significantly
(p < 0.005), greater increase in Pi/PCr (protocol A: 210%, protocol B
: 50%); and a significantly (p < 0.001), lower pH(i) (protocol A: 6.8
+/- 0.16, protocol B: 7.03 +/- 0.12). We conclude that the shorter dut
y cycle produces more fatigue throughout the stimulation period, possi
bly as a result of greater intracellular acidosis and reduced availabi
lity of the high energy phosphate PCr. The clinical application of thi
s finding relates to the selection of a stimulation protocol that maxi
mizes strength gains in atrophic vs healthy muscle.