Background. Despite markedly different clinical presentations, few studies
have reported differences in neuropsychological functioning between mania a
nd depression. Recent work has suggested that differences may emerge on cog
nitive tasks requiring affective processing, such as decision-making. The p
resent study sought to compare decision-making cognition in mania and depre
ssion in order to clarify the current profiles of impairment for these diso
rders and to contribute to our more general understanding of the relationsh
ip between mood and cognition.
Methods. Medicated manic patients, depressed patients, and normal healthy c
ontrols completed a computerized decision-making task. All subjects were as
ked to win as many points as possible by choosing outcomes based on variabl
y-weighted probabilities and by placing 'bets' on each decision.
Results. Both patient groups were impaired on this task, as evidenced by sl
ower deliberation times, a failure to accumulate as many points as controls
and suboptimal betting strategies. Manic, but not depressed, patients made
suboptimal decisions - an impairment that correlated with the severity of
their illness.
Conclusions. These findings are consistent with a growing consensus that ma
nic and depressed patients are characterized by significant impairments in
cognitive and particularly executive, functioning. Furthermore, the distinc
t patterns of observed impairment in manic and depressed patients suggests
that the nature and extent of cognitive impairment differ between these two
groups. Viewed in the context of other recent studies, these findings are
consistent with a role for the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in mediating
mood-cognition relationships.