Ms. Wallace et al., Topical delivery of lidocaine in healthy volunteers by electroporation, electroincorporation. or iontophoresis: An evaluation of skin anesthesia, REG ANES PA, 26(3), 2001, pp. 229-238
Background and Objectives: This study was designed to compare the onset, du
ration, and depth of local anesthesia after the topical deliver of lidocain
e using electroporation (EP), electroincorporation (EI), and iontophoresis
(IP) in healthy volunteers. EP and EI were performed with prototype devices
and IP with a commercial drug/device product.
Methods: A double-blind, crossover study design was used for 10 randomized
volunteers selected for EP treatment with either 4%. 10%. or 20% lidocaine
or placebo normal saline. Because it was impossible to blind between IF. EP
, and Fl. an open label study with randomized volunteers was selected for I
P and EP treatments. Onset and duration of anesthesia was determined by mea
suring warm sensation, cool sensation. and hot pain; depth of anesthesia wa
s determined by measurement of pain sensation to a 27-gauge needle passed t
hrough the skin.
Results: For EP, all concentrations of lidocaine produced significant chang
es from baseline on 2 or 3 efficacy measures, however, the 4% concentration
appeared to be the most efficacious when delivered by the EP method. The E
P and EI methods produced a significant elevation in all 3 thermal threshol
ds, whereas IP produced significant elevations in cool and warm thresholds
only. However. IP resulted in a greater depth of anesthesia. Plasma lidocai
ne levels were undetectable.
Conclusions: The transdermal delivery of lidocaine by IF, EP, and EI result
s in similar surface skin anesthesia: however, IP results in a greater dept
h of anesthesia.