To resolve several taxonomic problems within the family Conochilidae (Rotif
era, Monogononta, Flosculariacea), we initiated a comparative study of the
morphology in this and related taxa using samples collected from widely sep
arated geographical regions. As part of this study, we paid special attenti
on to trophal morphology using scanning electron microscopy. We also constr
ucted and analysed a data matrix comprising 19 morphological characters of
11 taxa using cladistic methods to uncover all most-parsimonious trees. The
results indicate that Conochilidae share a body form with Flosculariidae,
but they possess a trophal structure which clearly differentiates them from
all other Flosculariacea; thus, the diagnosis of the family Conochilidae i
s amended to incorporate morphological characters of the trophi. The analys
is of our data matrix yielded a single, most-parsimonious tree. From the to
pology of that tree and our scanning electron microscopy observations, we p
ropose the following: (1) the status of Conochilidae as a separate suborder
of Flosculariacea is rejected; (2) taxonomic separation of Conochilus and
Conochiloides as subgenera of Conochilus is confirmed; and (3) Lacinularia
causeyae Vidrine, Mclaughlin & Willis, 1985 is reallocated to a new genus w
ithin the family Conochilide, Conochilopsis gen. nov., as Conochilopsis cau
seyae (Vidrine et al.) comb. nov.