Rationale and Objectives. To improve understanding of academic radiologists
clinical worldoads, the Society of Chair men of Academic Radiology Departm
ents (SCARD) performed surveys to collect workload data for radiologists in
20 departments; workload was measured in relative value units (RVUs) per f
ull-time equivalent (FTE), Although they were useful for comparisons within
some subspecialties, the workload data proved inadequate for comparisons a
cross sections, and adjustment factors were needed for each Current Procedu
re Terminology (CPT) code.
Materials and Methods, All CPT codes for examinations were divided into gro
ups with similar radiologist work effort. Focusing on radiologists who work
ed almost exclusively in each group, the authors created adjustment factors
by using data from the individual radiologists at each institution.
Results. The adjustment factors are 0.50 for angiography, 0.58 for computed
tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and 1.0 for nuclear medicine, p
lain radiography, and special procedures ino adjustment needed for these gr
oups). These factors are multiplied by the work RVUs for each examination t
o create the adjusted workload RVUs.
Conclusion. The SCARD survey provided very useful clinical workload data, w
ith workload measured in work RVUs per FTE for specific subspecialty sectio
ns. The new adjusted workload RVUs allow comparison of radiologists' worklo
ad across subspecialties.