Specificity of reinnervation and motor recovery after interposition of an artificial barrier between transected and repaired nerves in adjacency - Anexperimental study in the rat
Bs. Lutz et al., Specificity of reinnervation and motor recovery after interposition of an artificial barrier between transected and repaired nerves in adjacency - Anexperimental study in the rat, ACT NEUROCH, 143(4), 2001, pp. 393-399
Non-specific re-innervation of target organs caused by misdirected axonal g
rowth at the repair site is regarded as one reason for a poor functional ou
tcome after peripheral nerve transsection and repair. This study investigat
es the rate of aberrant re-innervation and its influence on motor recovery
in the rat sciatic nerve using artificial sheets as barrier between tibial
and peroneal nerves.
The sciatic nerve was transsected and repaired as follows: epineural suture
s (A x 6), fascicular repair of tibial and peroneal nerves respectively (B
x 8), and the same as in group B, but separating both nerves using an Integ
ra (R) -sheet with silicone (C x 8), or Integra (R) without silicone (D x 8
). As control, solely the tibial nerve was transsected and repaired (E x 5)
.
Final investigations after 4 months revealed that in group C, 50% of the In
tegra (R) -silicone sheets were dislocated. No dislocation was found in gro
up D. Muscle contraction force of the gastrocnemius muscle was significantl
y higher in group E as compared to all other groups. However although not s
ignificant, group D showed a consistently higher muscle contraction force t
han groups A, B, and C. Histology in groups A, B, and C with dislocated she
ets demonstrated multiple axons growing from the tibial to the peroneal ner
ve and vice versa. In groups D and E, no such axonal growth was visible. Th
ese findings were confirmed by a significantly higher rate of specific rein
nervation of the soleus muscle using sequential retrograde double labelling
technique.
Results of this study suggest that an artificial sheet such as Integra (R)
bears the potential of preventing aberrant re-innervation between repaired
adjacent nerves resulting in improved motor recovery. Clinically, this tech
nique may be of importance for brachial plexus, sciatic nerve, and facial n
erve repair.