Ra. Respess et al., Laboratory testing and rapid HIV assays: applications for HIV surveillancein hard-to-reach populations, AIDS, 15, 2001, pp. S49-S59
Most HIV surveillance has been performed through serologic surveys in relat
ively stable, accessible populations. Similar surveillance, with or without
counseling and testing, in populations that are hard-to-reach, presents lo
gistical challenges, including the selection of laboratory testing strategy
and algorithm. The advent of rapid serologic assays for HIV now allows for
on-site testing, including confirmatory testing, and rapid prevision of te
st results and counseling. The possibility of only a single contact makes r
epeat sampling, which current diagnostic testing recommendations include, d
ifficult. To address the logistical complexities in surveillance in hard-to
-reach populations and the increased availability of rapid tests, we propos
e adapting the testing strategies for HIV of the World Health Organization/
the joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS in order to facilitate this
surveillance, including, where carried out, the provision of test results b
ack to individuals. The choice of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
versus rapid testing for these settings is discussed, as is the choice of
specimen - blood, oral fluid, or urine. Three appendices summarize: (1) tes
t algorithms for the various testing strategies; (2) advantages and disadva
ntages of ELISA and of rapid test formats, and (3) the characteristics and
status of currently available rapid HIV tests. We also discuss the potentia
l application of the recently developed 'detuned' methodology for estimatin
g HIV incidence in hard-to-reach populations. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams
& Wilkins.