S. Demirel et Ca. Johnson, Incidence and prevalence of short wavelength automated perimetry deficits in ocular hypertensive patients, AM J OPHTH, 131(6), 2001, pp. 709-715
PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence and incidence of short wavelength auto
mated perimetry deficits in comparison to standard automated perimetry defi
cits in patients with ocular hypertension,
METHODS: Five hundred eyes of 250 patients with ocular hypertension were re
cruited into a prospective, longitudinal study and tested with standard aut
omated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry annually for 5 ye
ars. Both eyes of 60 normal subjects, 21 to 85 years of: age, were used to
establish normative data for short wavelength automated perimetry and stand
ard automated perimetry, This allowed independent evaluation of left and ri
ght eyes of patients. All normal data were corrected for age, and short wav
elength automated perimetry results were corrected for lens transmission. T
he lowest fifth and first percentiles for the normal observers were derived
for the 10 glaucoma hemifield test zones for short wavelength automated pe
rimetry and standard automated perimetry, Visual fields were considered out
side normal limits if two glaucoma hemifield test zones were below the norm
al fifth percentile or one glaucoma hemifield test zone was below the norma
l first percentile.
RESULTS: Baseline prevalence of short wavelength automated perimetry and st
andard automated perimetry deficits were 9.4% and 1.4%, respectively. Durin
g the study, incident rates of field loss were 6.2% (1.23% per year) for sh
ort wavelength automated perimetry and 5.9% (1.18% per year) for standard a
utomated perimetry. Once abnormal, 80% of short wavelength automated perime
try fields remained abnormal on the next examination, whereas only 45% of a
bnormal standard automated perimetry fields remained abnormal. New short wa
velength automated perimetry deficits in ocular hypertensives were more pro
minent and more persistent than new standard automated perimetry deficits,
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are consistent with the interpretation that short
wavelength automated perimetry deficits occur before standard automated pe
rimetry deficits in glaucoma, The similar incidence rates suggest that both
standard automated perimetry and short wave length automated perimetry are
monitoring the same underlying glaucomatous disease process. (Am J Ophthal
mol 2001;131:709-715. (C) 2001 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved
.).