The use of the uniformly most powerful among the unbiased (UMPU) test was r
ecently suggested for the study of gametic association between two polymorp
hic loci as an alternative to the Fishers exact test (Zapata and Alvarez, 1
997, Annals of Human Genetics 61, 71-77). However, the proposed test is not
UMPU for two-sided alternatives. In this study, we present the UMPU test,
discuss criticisms against the use of randomized tests, and compare the pow
er of several tests. We show that, in many practical cases, the use of the
UMPU test is less than desirable and propose the alternative adjusted-more
extreme tables (A-MET) and the equal-tails (ET) tests. We suggest that some
of the general arguments against the use of randomized tests can be allevi
ated by a newly proposed extended p-value definition.