The notion that developmental dyslexia may result from a general, nonspecif
ic, defect in perceiving rapidly changing auditory signals is a current sub
ject of debate (so-called ''temporal processing deficit'' hypothesis). Thir
teen phonological dyslexics (age 1013 years) and 10 controls matched for ch
ronological and reading age were compared on a temporal order judgement (TO
J) task using the succession of two consonants (/p/-/s/) within a cluster.
Ln order to test the relevance of the temporal deficit hypothesis, the task
also included two additional conditions where either the two stimuli were
artificially slowed or the interstimulus interval was expanded. As expected
, the TOJ performance was significantly poorer in dyslexics than in control
s. Moreover, in the "slowed speech" condition dyslexics' performance improv
ed to reach the normal controls' level, whereas no significant improvement
occurred when increasing the interstimulus interval. Finally dyslexics' per
formances, especially on the slowed condition, were found correlated with s
everal tests of phonological processing (phoneme deletion, rhyme judgment,
and nonword spelling tasks). These results lend support to the general temp
oral deficit theory of dyslexia. (C) 2001 Academic Press.